When you are Chief Procrastinator of the United Kingdom, as I am, you will always be able to find something to do, rather than the thing you should be doing. Most people, have one thing, something that they will revert to doing; their main passion. The Long Suffering Husband will watch a film and my son does maths (he has tried really hard to revise for his mocks but always ends up accidentally doing maths, which is a shame as he doesn't have a maths mock).
I have prided myself on the fact that I have a diverse range of thoughts and activities to divert me but I am beginning to suspect that I have found my thing. It is beginning to worry me, though. If my thing was music, or cake, or books, or digging then I wouldn't need to be ashamed but I think my thing might be boobs.
I spent a whole day considering how my breasts spoilt the line of my beads. I focused too much energy on how my new improved posture was making my chest enter a room three days before I did. At the weekend, I decided that I was probably wearing the wrong bra size, so I thought I'd give buying a new one another go. I now have every size bra from 32-38 and B-F cup. I stood in Marks and Spencer changing room being assured by the assistant that this one was definitely the right size. I asked why it was so different from the last time I was fitted and she said, "We've only just started stocking your size. We didn't have bras for big skinny women before so we went up a couple of band sizes and down a couple of cup sizes." This is exactly what used to happen to me in Clark's shoe shop when I was a child. They would say, "We don't have any in such a narrow width fitting so we'll go down a size." I ended up with hammer toes and so I'm now a bit concerned about possible deformity to my bosom.
Today, I've mostly spent the whole day trying to decide if my new bra hurts or whether it fits perfectly. It looks like it fits. I know, I've looked several times today. I've also gone to take it off every half hour since half past ten this morning and then decided to give it a whole day. I have this dream that one day I'll have a bra that I can wear all day without even noticing that I'm wearing it but maybe I just have a boob obsession that will cause me to think about whatever I'm wearing.
Monday, 13 January 2014
Sunday, 12 January 2014
That's what I call Customer Service
Apple products cost a lot of money but you purchase them with a level of customer service that is unbeaten. My charging lead for my i-phone has stopped charging. I could have got quite upset and demanded a new one because the lead is really bad designed. It is almost impossible to remove the charging lead without pulling on the chord, due to the tiny adapter that is very difficult to get a good grip on, causing the wires to disconnect. However, I decided not to make a fuss but to just go and buy a new one (and try to be more careful with it)
I walked into the shop and went straight to the till with the new lead. The man asked, "Did you need any help with that?"
I looked at him, looked at the box, looked back at him, scratched my head and said, "it's a really tiny box."
He appeared confused.
There was an awkward moment of silence.
"Were you able to choose the product for yourself or did you need help?" he clarified.
"Oh, she thought you were offering to carry it to the car for her," said the Long Suffering Husband.
Now, that would have been good Customer Service.
I walked into the shop and went straight to the till with the new lead. The man asked, "Did you need any help with that?"
I looked at him, looked at the box, looked back at him, scratched my head and said, "it's a really tiny box."
He appeared confused.
There was an awkward moment of silence.
"Were you able to choose the product for yourself or did you need help?" he clarified.
"Oh, she thought you were offering to carry it to the car for her," said the Long Suffering Husband.
Now, that would have been good Customer Service.
Saturday, 11 January 2014
Licenced to Kill
I was going to write a blog about my difficulty with beads but the latest announcement by Labour on education has changed my mind. I will, however, give you a clip from the beginning of Thoroughly Modern Millie and a photo, which explains my bead problem perfectly.
The Long Suffering Husband came into the room, as I was contemplating my bead problem and said, "What are they? Dogs ?" He was furious at the idea of teachers having to be 'licenced'. He felt it implied that teachers were less than human. He is, obviously concerned that I might lose the job I love doing if Labour gets voted in at the next parliament. (I'm not so worried. I can always do something else) but he was more concerned for the individual people who had educated our children.
Licence is such a terrible word. A licence is required for things that are dangerous. We have a licence to drive a car because it is too easy to kill with a car if you don't know what you're doing; dogs were licenced because an untrained, uncontrolled dog could kill and you need a licence to own a gun for similarly obvious reasons. In the UK, Doctors are given a licence to practise but a doctor who doesn't know what they're doing can kill someone. I could be wrong but I don't think teachers kill; even really bad teachers are no threat to life.
By suggesting that teachers need to be licenced the Labour party are implying that teachers are dangerous, that the education of a child is the sole responsibility of the teacher and a child who doesn't reach an average level is a danger to society. Let's not buy into this idea. We know that teachers are only part of what happens in a child's education. We know that parents, friends, clubs, TV, video games and many other things in society shape what our children learn. I follow a wonderful blog of a mother, whose child has a particular syndrome that requires her to have a special education, who wrote recently about how she knows better about the books her child wants to read than her teachers or the education authority. http://livingwithrettsyndrome.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/no-to-the-very-busy-spider-just-no.html . This parent constantly makes brilliant choices for her child, as do parents all over the country and equally there will be parents who make less good choices. School isn't the most important thing for lots of people.
Until recently, the licence for Doctors, granted by the General Medical Council, was for life. Since, 2012 doctors now need to re-validate their licence every 5 years, which is done via regular appraisals with their employer. Tristam Hunt announced that teachers will need to be re-licenced every two years. Oh, God, teachers are more likely to kill someone than doctors! They didn't say exactly how teachers are to be licenced, or re-licenced and if it is through regular appraisals with their employer then teachers have nothing to fear because all teachers have a performance management appraisal at least once a year and are observed teaching by their senior management and peers more often. Teaching is a constant challenge of trying to be better. However, we all know that this is not what they mean. They mean time out of a classroom, time at college or time being assessed by an outside government authority, like Ofsted. Do any of these things help the children?
Tristram Hunt said that this process would make it easier to sack bad teachers. I'm quite confused about this. Where are all these bad teachers? And what exactly are they doing that is so terrible? I learnt a lot from teachers who would be considered to be failures by today's standards. Even good teachers are leaving the profession because the pressures and workload are too great and I just can't believe the bad teachers are staying.
He also said, "If you're not a motivated teacher - passionate about your subject, passionate about being in the classroom - then you really have no business being a teacher." Maybe this is true. The teachers I know are passionate and motivated but they also have bad days and are occasionally forced to teach a subject that they are not fully committed to. That's normally, surely? Primary school teachers can't be passionate about every subject. He compares them to doctors and lawyers and implies that they are equivalent professions but while medical practitioners earn an average of £69K pa and lawyers earn an average of £70k, the average teacher's salary is £32K pa. (Figures from thisismoney.co.uk). Metal plate workers and riveters have a similar annual salary, I wonder if they are have no business holding a welding tool if they don't have 100% passion and commitment.
Michael Gove, should be a gift to a shadow education secretary. Teachers, parents and students hate him equally: all those voters that could be won over and instead he has chosen to further demonise teachers. If this idea ever does get passed and if by some fluke I ever manage to get licensed, then I'm going to have cards printed that say:
Julia of All Trades
Music Teacher
Licenced to Kill.
I think I'll add the picture of my bead problem, just to let everyone know just how serious this is.
Monday, 6 January 2014
Too simple?
I'm sitting here, feeling really clever because I knew a few answers on University Challenge. Admittedly, one of the answers was my home town but it's enough to make me feel really clever. We all love knowing the right answer to something but does knowing something make you intelligent?
Politicians like to think they're smarter than the rest of us. I'd quite like to see a Politician version of University Challenge but I don't need the politician I vote for to know more stuff than anyone else. I want her or him to be able to think, to understand the problems that people face, to find creative solutions, whilst being honest and truthful. Is that too simple?
There have been some really scary surveys recently about how unlikely young people are to vote. When they are interviewed they say things like, "It makes no difference," and "You can't trust them anyway." They don't say, "The Politicians don't know enough stuff."
If there was anything more likely to put me off voting it would be the current argument the politicians are having about World War 1. There is a big spat to see who knows 'the truth' about the war. It is interesting how it all started. Michael Gove was on Radio 4's Start the Week , being rather Govish about the teaching of History. In his opinion, there is stuff about History that is true; stuff you have to know; an order to History that is important (Greeks before Romans!) and as his children are too stupid to understand any of that unless it is taught in a certain way then all children have to be taught in that way. I've probably oversimplified but who cares? If you do then you can listen to it for yourself here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03mcmwx.
After Andrew Marr had got a bit upset that his guests weren't arguing more they started to discuss the First World War. With the centenary of the war coming up countries and governments across Europe are discussing how to commemorate or celebrate (that seems like the wrong word to me) this anniversary. I can see why it's important to not forget this piece of history and try to get the most accurate stories about the events written down now that 100 years after the event the people who were there at the time have gone. Mr Gove, seemed quite insistent that there were some stories about this war that were just not right; that were dreamed up by lefties and Bolsheviks; that missed the point that it was all Germany's fault and that we as the master-race of English people put it all right. He was particularly upset by the most important Historical study of the era, Blackadder. His words were then lifted for a Daily Mail article and again if I've oversimplified and you want to read it for yourself then you can read it here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2532930/MICHAEL-GOVE-Why-does-Left-insist-belittling-true-British-heroes.html.
Michael Gove's opposite number in the labour party, shadow education secretary, Tristram Hunt (who does actually have a Phd in History, rather than a box set of Blackadder shows) felt he had to reply and show the world that he knows the most stuff about this era of History. In the Guardian, he wrote that Mr Gove's attempt to use this period of history to wage a political war was just not cricket. He went on to say that it might be a little more complicated than 'it was all the Germans fault.' I did think it was a bit hypocritical to say that Gove wasn't allowed to make the war a political battle and then spend half of his own article saying how the Socialists had reacted to the war. Again, probably oversimplified and if you want to read it for yourself it;s here: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/04/first-world-war-michael-gove-left-bashing-history
Then today, Boris Johnson has joined the spat. He has to prove he knows the right answers about the war. I don't know if he managed that but he did prove that he is a brilliant writer and should have never given up journalism for politics. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10552336/Germany-started-the-Great-War-but-the-Left-cant-bear-to-say-so.html He seems to think that Tristam Hunt should resign for getting it wrong. The Germans did start the war and to deny it to stop 'Kraut bashing' is a sackable offence.
It is entirely possible that all of these politicians have it right. A war that lasted 4 years 2 months and 13 days that affected millions of people will have many his-stories and her-stories attached to it. Some will seem false from another person's perspective but it doesn't make it any less of a truth to the person who witnessed it or wrote it down.
It just doesn't matter, either. Politicians shouldn't be sacked for knowing or not knowing stuff about History or having beliefs that are different from anyone else. They shouldn't really have time to write articles for the Mail, Guardian or Telegraph. They are paid at least £66,000 a year to try to make our lives better and this current spat does nothing to improve anyone's life.
Politicians like to think they're smarter than the rest of us. I'd quite like to see a Politician version of University Challenge but I don't need the politician I vote for to know more stuff than anyone else. I want her or him to be able to think, to understand the problems that people face, to find creative solutions, whilst being honest and truthful. Is that too simple?
There have been some really scary surveys recently about how unlikely young people are to vote. When they are interviewed they say things like, "It makes no difference," and "You can't trust them anyway." They don't say, "The Politicians don't know enough stuff."
If there was anything more likely to put me off voting it would be the current argument the politicians are having about World War 1. There is a big spat to see who knows 'the truth' about the war. It is interesting how it all started. Michael Gove was on Radio 4's Start the Week , being rather Govish about the teaching of History. In his opinion, there is stuff about History that is true; stuff you have to know; an order to History that is important (Greeks before Romans!) and as his children are too stupid to understand any of that unless it is taught in a certain way then all children have to be taught in that way. I've probably oversimplified but who cares? If you do then you can listen to it for yourself here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03mcmwx.
| Michael Gove looking quite simple |
After Andrew Marr had got a bit upset that his guests weren't arguing more they started to discuss the First World War. With the centenary of the war coming up countries and governments across Europe are discussing how to commemorate or celebrate (that seems like the wrong word to me) this anniversary. I can see why it's important to not forget this piece of history and try to get the most accurate stories about the events written down now that 100 years after the event the people who were there at the time have gone. Mr Gove, seemed quite insistent that there were some stories about this war that were just not right; that were dreamed up by lefties and Bolsheviks; that missed the point that it was all Germany's fault and that we as the master-race of English people put it all right. He was particularly upset by the most important Historical study of the era, Blackadder. His words were then lifted for a Daily Mail article and again if I've oversimplified and you want to read it for yourself then you can read it here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2532930/MICHAEL-GOVE-Why-does-Left-insist-belittling-true-British-heroes.html.
| Tristram Hunt also looking a bit simple |
Michael Gove's opposite number in the labour party, shadow education secretary, Tristram Hunt (who does actually have a Phd in History, rather than a box set of Blackadder shows) felt he had to reply and show the world that he knows the most stuff about this era of History. In the Guardian, he wrote that Mr Gove's attempt to use this period of history to wage a political war was just not cricket. He went on to say that it might be a little more complicated than 'it was all the Germans fault.' I did think it was a bit hypocritical to say that Gove wasn't allowed to make the war a political battle and then spend half of his own article saying how the Socialists had reacted to the war. Again, probably oversimplified and if you want to read it for yourself it;s here: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/04/first-world-war-michael-gove-left-bashing-history
| Boris Johnson giving a masterclass on looking simple. |
It is entirely possible that all of these politicians have it right. A war that lasted 4 years 2 months and 13 days that affected millions of people will have many his-stories and her-stories attached to it. Some will seem false from another person's perspective but it doesn't make it any less of a truth to the person who witnessed it or wrote it down.
It just doesn't matter, either. Politicians shouldn't be sacked for knowing or not knowing stuff about History or having beliefs that are different from anyone else. They shouldn't really have time to write articles for the Mail, Guardian or Telegraph. They are paid at least £66,000 a year to try to make our lives better and this current spat does nothing to improve anyone's life.
Saturday, 4 January 2014
Secret Lives of Teachers
I wish I'd known more about my primary school teachers.
When I started working in a primary school I discovered that teachers at this level are quite interesting people. Some have unusual passions and interests. The idea that there is more to a person than they present on the surface is always one that has interested me but this seems even more exciting when you think about primary school teachers. They have a carefully crafted image. They are sweet, kind, encouraging and they work, oh so hard, that they never get time to do anything but mark books and complete paperwork. The inner life, however, could be far more interesting.
I'm sure this is true for all teachers but primary school teachers are different. Most senior teachers did a degree in the subject they then went on to teach. At senior school, my two maths teachers called Smith both did Maths degrees. One was tall and slim, read the Guardian, and was in his University rowing team and was impressed by my extensive Baroque music repetoire and the other was short and fat, read the Sun, played rugby and taught me lots of rude songs when we rehearsed in the staff/pupil choir. My drama teacher did a drama degree, worked in the theatre for a while before teaching and then became a woman and had to stop teaching. My music teacher went to music college for his degree, played the flute and piano, had a wife and two lovely children (contrary to the rumours that he only liked men) and could play his flute standing on his head (literally - a great party trick). My teachers at senior school were no mystery. Odd but not mysterious.
Some primary school teachers' degrees are in primary education but most did a degree in something interesting first . I know dancers, artists, geologists, actors, writers, journalists, psychologists, people with degrees in business management to name a few. Yesterday, however, I discovered from a facebook picture that one of my colleagues is actually a mermaid! I shouldn't have been surprised because she knows a lot about the sea and sea creatures, is beautiful with long blond hair but I had just assumed the beauty to be a co-incidence and her knowledge of the sea to be from a degree in marine biology.
In the Infants I had a teacher called Mrs Jones. I thought Mrs Jones was as boring as her name, only reading Janet and John books and counting up to 10. She was, however, an expert on spots. If any child in the school had a single spot they would be taken to Mrs Jones for inspection. Thinking now, maybe Mrs Jones had a degree in microbiology and grew secret cultures of mould and viruses, which she would test out on the children. My other infant teacher's name escapes me and all I can remember about her was that she was obsessed with safety. She taught us about making sure ladders were straight, wearing seat belts in the correct way (even in the back seat of the car - unheard of in the 70s) and wearing a cycle helmet (how we laughed at her). Maybe, though, she knew about all of this because she had a reason to be familiar with safety equipment. Maybe she was a secret daredevil, who abseiled down tall buildings or walked tightropes. My first Junior school teacher would keep us quiet by taking out and putting back in her contact lenses. It was gross and we loved it. I remember her as a quiet mousy woman but normal people didn't wear contact lenses in 1973 so she must have been a model!
How could I have missed all of this?
When I started working in a primary school I discovered that teachers at this level are quite interesting people. Some have unusual passions and interests. The idea that there is more to a person than they present on the surface is always one that has interested me but this seems even more exciting when you think about primary school teachers. They have a carefully crafted image. They are sweet, kind, encouraging and they work, oh so hard, that they never get time to do anything but mark books and complete paperwork. The inner life, however, could be far more interesting.
I'm sure this is true for all teachers but primary school teachers are different. Most senior teachers did a degree in the subject they then went on to teach. At senior school, my two maths teachers called Smith both did Maths degrees. One was tall and slim, read the Guardian, and was in his University rowing team and was impressed by my extensive Baroque music repetoire and the other was short and fat, read the Sun, played rugby and taught me lots of rude songs when we rehearsed in the staff/pupil choir. My drama teacher did a drama degree, worked in the theatre for a while before teaching and then became a woman and had to stop teaching. My music teacher went to music college for his degree, played the flute and piano, had a wife and two lovely children (contrary to the rumours that he only liked men) and could play his flute standing on his head (literally - a great party trick). My teachers at senior school were no mystery. Odd but not mysterious.
Some primary school teachers' degrees are in primary education but most did a degree in something interesting first . I know dancers, artists, geologists, actors, writers, journalists, psychologists, people with degrees in business management to name a few. Yesterday, however, I discovered from a facebook picture that one of my colleagues is actually a mermaid! I shouldn't have been surprised because she knows a lot about the sea and sea creatures, is beautiful with long blond hair but I had just assumed the beauty to be a co-incidence and her knowledge of the sea to be from a degree in marine biology.

In the Infants I had a teacher called Mrs Jones. I thought Mrs Jones was as boring as her name, only reading Janet and John books and counting up to 10. She was, however, an expert on spots. If any child in the school had a single spot they would be taken to Mrs Jones for inspection. Thinking now, maybe Mrs Jones had a degree in microbiology and grew secret cultures of mould and viruses, which she would test out on the children. My other infant teacher's name escapes me and all I can remember about her was that she was obsessed with safety. She taught us about making sure ladders were straight, wearing seat belts in the correct way (even in the back seat of the car - unheard of in the 70s) and wearing a cycle helmet (how we laughed at her). Maybe, though, she knew about all of this because she had a reason to be familiar with safety equipment. Maybe she was a secret daredevil, who abseiled down tall buildings or walked tightropes. My first Junior school teacher would keep us quiet by taking out and putting back in her contact lenses. It was gross and we loved it. I remember her as a quiet mousy woman but normal people didn't wear contact lenses in 1973 so she must have been a model!
How could I have missed all of this?
Thursday, 2 January 2014
Beautiful Patterns
You watched Sherlock, right? Of course you did. Everyone did. You'd waited 2 years to find out if you were right. You saw him jump, you saw the body, you saw all the people confirm his death but you also saw him at his own funeral and you have your own ideas about how but now you want to know.
This possibly isn't an example of beautiful poetry but I just wanted to try it.
http://anthonywilsonpoetry.com/2013/10/25/lifesaving-poems-underneath-the-mathematics-of-time/
I'm still chuckling about it this morning. The author didn't know! He wrote that it happened but that was it. He wrote it, stepped back and watched the internet make up the answers for him. Then he wrote some of the blog and twitter answers into yesterday's episode, making it so ambiguous that anyone who had a different answer could have been right too. You think he told you it was about a bungee rope, a mattress, a cyclist, a well placed ambulance station, an imposdibly young doe-eyed female doctor. But did he? He left you with the mad man and his post it notes saying, "You wouldn't have told me if that was the truth!"
I am in awe. We have so much to learn about life and art (probably the same thing in my opinion but don't tell the scientists) from Stephen Moffat. There aren't any right answers. All answers are possible or not possible. Our job and reason for being is just to make the links, however obscure. In fact, those people who can make links that others can't are getting even more out of life. We have brains that see patterns where none exist and we enjoy finding patterns no one has seen before.
| Ink Blot Test |
Beautiful poetry can be made by stringing unusual words together.
Between the cushion of sky
On top of a paperchain of fields
Over a Christmas Cake of rain
Against a stripy sock of forest
Next to a chess set of sunshine
Except the dog night.
This possibly isn't an example of beautiful poetry but I just wanted to try it.
http://anthonywilsonpoetry.com/2013/10/25/lifesaving-poems-underneath-the-mathematics-of-time/
Art becomes beautiful if it allows for many different interpretations.
Stravinsky pushed the boundaries of music byusing 12 tones, making it atonal but there is still a pattern. Vi Hart explains this beautifully here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4niz8TfY794
Stravinsky pushed the boundaries of music byusing 12 tones, making it atonal but there is still a pattern. Vi Hart explains this beautifully here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4niz8TfY794
So, I've finally come up with a New Year's Resolution to top last year's list. This year I am going to be beautiful. I'm making no plans, deciding on no pattern but instead I'm just going to create the life that happens, no matter how weird or unusual and I'm going to let others find the pattern in it.
Tuesday, 31 December 2013
The Most Depressing Day of the Year
In the world of Grumpy Old Women this is the most depressing day of the year. It's the day when you have to think about all the things about your life you are meant to change. You are supposed to give up drinking, smoking, eating chocolate; lose weight and improve your life, and generally stop having fun.
Facebook is a long list of people saying that last year was terrible and how they hope that next year is better. My Twitter feed is a little more diverse but still mostly moaning.
Then you have to stay awake until midnight and pretend to be happy that another year has passed, when really all you want to have done was fall asleep on the sofa about two hours earlier.
The television and radio tell you about all the people that have died this year. When I was a child I thought that all those people had died that day. This year there are just over 11 minutes of notable UK deaths to watch.
Facebook is a long list of people saying that last year was terrible and how they hope that next year is better. My Twitter feed is a little more diverse but still mostly moaning.
Then you have to stay awake until midnight and pretend to be happy that another year has passed, when really all you want to have done was fall asleep on the sofa about two hours earlier.
The television and radio tell you about all the people that have died this year. When I was a child I thought that all those people had died that day. This year there are just over 11 minutes of notable UK deaths to watch.
Warning: The above clip ends with a rather scary shot of Margret Thatcher after she appears to have made a Brownie promise.
The weather is miserable and it's dark all day, it's cold and it rains.
An intervention has been staged. The dog has me pinned to the sofa and my son has put on the box set of Big Bang Theory. Friends have been invited for dinner and silly games until we can pop the party poppers and open the bubbles. I am now smiling lets hope I can stay awake for long enough.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


